We have detected that your browser is using AdBlock

Police Community is a not for profit organisation and advertising revenue is key to our continued viability.

Please disable your AdBlocker on our site in order to continue using it.
This message will disappear once AdBlock has been disabled.

Thank you for your support - we appreciate it !

If you feel you are getting this message in error please email support@policecommunity.co.uk

Sign in to follow this  

'We demand you tell the public the truth'

Recommended Posts

All 43 federations sign open letter to Prime Minister demanding 'a properly funded and well-resourced police service'.


Prime Minister Theresa May

Those representing rank and file officers across the country have written an open letter to the government describing the recent pay award as 'derisory'.

Representatives from all 43 police federations in the country endorsed the letter, saying “members were angry” and forces “had been put in an impossible situation.”

Police Federation of England and Wales Vice Chairman Calum Macleod said: “We feel the government has not been truthful and honest about the pay award given to officers, and that is insulting.

"The two per cent awarded has to come from existing policing budgets which means forces may have to choose between officer numbers and public safety. That cannot be right."

The full letter reads: 


Dear Prime Minister,

On behalf of the hard working officers who are working to the bone to protect our people, who fight to protect our communities and who keep you safe, we demand answers.


And we demand that you tell the public the truth. About crime figures. About police numbers. About the ‘extra’ officers you pledge. About ‘extra’ money you say you will pay.


No more smoke. No more mirrors. No more double standards.


You expect officers to run towards terrorists one minute and then turn your backs when we ask for help so they can afford to feed their families. Families they barely see because of the hours they work to fill the void left by the thousands of officers who are no longer there because of your cuts.


Officers who are now broken. Who are unable to cope with the mental and physical demands placed upon them by having to work in depleted environments. With out of date kit .With fewer people. With no support. One chief constable has just this week told you that 40 per cent of his officers have sought professional help for stress. It is the tip of the iceberg.

Our officers are committed to serving the public. And we thank the public for their overwhelming support, particularly in light of recent incidents. But with 20,000 fewer police officers than five years ago it is no wonder we have seen crime rise and the service to the public suffer. This is not fair on them.


And two per cent pay rise with no extra money to pay for it means it is the public who will yet again suffer and get even less of a service.

So hear us when we say:

  • The pay award of on average less than £10 a week is insulting.
  • A two per cent rise is not a rise when it has to come from existing policing budgets.
  • It’s a disgrace you have dressed it up as a pay rise.
  • Funding must come centrally, it is unfair to make the public suffer with fewer officers available to fight crime.
  • It’s a disgrace you have ignored the recommendations from the independent Police Remuneration Review Body – the very body you set up to advise on police pay.
  • Forces cannot cope with any further falls in police numbers.
  • Communities will be further under threat at the very time protection is needed the most. Community policing plays a vital part in intelligence gathering to help combat terrorism and it has been decimated.
  • ‘Extra’ police officers are not ‘extra’ police officers. They are the same officers doing longer hours, being called back in when they are off or being given extra responsibilities.
  • Crime is not falling.

And answer our questions:

  •  Why was the independent body, which has awarded MPs and ministers a 13 per cent rise over the last three years listened to when the independent police body on pay was not?
  •  How can you justify these double standards?
  •  Do you think it is acceptable that the derisory pay award is expected to come at a cost of losing more officers?

Our members have been failed by:

The FAILURE to heed our warnings.

The FAILURE to implement the very recommendations of the independent bodies you introduced.

The FAILURE to support them and the police service as a whole.

The FAILURE to help officers protect the country.

The FAILURE to help officers protect the public adequately.

We don’t want meaningless platitudes.


We want a properly funded and well-resourced police service. The public rightly want and expect this.


For the sake of those who put their lives on the line for the public we demand you address these injustices and give us answers.


Members of the interim National Council


View on Police Oracle

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah the Fed's strongly worded letter, their main weapon of choice.  I'm left wondering of if they are still keeping their fabled powder dry because I don't see much evidence of them doing anything effective to counter Tory spin regarding the police.  May's response, if she deems it worthy to respond to, will be to repeat the mantra that finding is protected, police have adequate resources, funding has increased, reforms are working and crime is down with any increase being due to better recording,  and last but not least they have fully approved the PRBs pay recommendation.

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course your contribution to standing up and being counted is. ......... Try bring a Federation Rep if you are disatisfied. There is an old saying about put up or,

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

We need some sort of representation but I joined the police to be a police officer not a Fed rep, but given that I am a paying member I expect them to try to act effectively on my behalf and quite frankly I very rarely see that from the national Fed.  Locally they are quite effective so I have got some admiration for some officials but they are a laughing stock nationally.  

There is another old saying that if you own a dog why bark yourself.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone should tell the public the truth it is the Police Service itself. For decades police officers of all ranks have being telling the public that everything in the garden is rosy and that the Nation was being served by the best and most efficient Police Service in the World. The truth of the matter is that for years we bluffed our way through thick and thin and we did it so well that the people and many politicians came to believe what was being said and arrived at the conclusion that policing on the cheap could be achieved without any harm being done to anyone and that, no matter how overstretched or underfunded police forces were, the job could always be done by the good old British bobby.

As I reflect over the past half-century I have no doubt that we must accept at least part of the blame for the current state of affairs.

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.